Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Comparison Between 1984 And Fahrenheit 451 - 1404 Words

Close examination of the respective protagonists and antagonists of both 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury reveals how the texts in question challenge and restructure the outdated ‘myth’ of moral absolutism through characters which do not comfortably fit the mould of ‘hero’ or ‘villain’. With reference to these characters and evaluation of their morality in relation to three key branches of normative ethical theory – namely deontological ethics, virtue ethics and care ethics– this essay will explore this statement, in addition to the flaws inherent within moral absolutism and the subsequent need for a degree of moral ambiguity in fiction. Deontology is an ethical theory which assesses the morality of an act, and by†¦show more content†¦Winston does not stop with what The Party terms â€Å"thoughtcrime† however, directly breaking the law in action as well as thought by repeatedly paying for sex, despite the fact that according to Party law â€Å"consorting with prostitutes [is] forbidden†. In contrast, the actions of Big Brother – Oceania’s great leader whose name is synonymous with power and the law, and the apparent villain of the novel – become the very height of morality. It is Big Brother’s idea to utilise a new, vastly censored and truncated form of English, called Newspeak, to â€Å"narrow the range of thought†. This language aims to eventually render the citizens of Oceania without the words required to mentally frame or communicate concepts like rebellion, dissatisfaction or resistance and thereby â€Å"make thoughtcrime literally impossible†. If moral actions are quantified, in alignment with deontological ethics, as those which protect and uphold the law, then rendering an entire populace unable to conceptualise disobedience must qualify as the ultimate act of ‘goodness’ – challenging the norm of an absolutely morally reprehensible antagonist or ‘bad guy’. However, if viewed according to the theory of virtue ethics, the actions of Big Brother must instead be classified as fundamentally wrong. Virtue ethicists argue for a more conventional understanding of morality, placing a high significance on the attributes of the mind and individual character, which would place the antagonistsShow MoreRelatedThe Loss of Personal Freedoms in a Totalitarian Government Essays1810 Words   |  8 Pagesspeak freely, they do not enjoy any personal freedoms or privacy, and the media is aggressively censored. This is the world of George Orwell’s 1984 and Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451. The protagonist of Fahrenheit 451 is Guy Montag, and he is a fireman. His job is to destroy books completely by setting fire to them. Winston Smith is the main character in 1984, where he works as a civil servant in the lower class ruling party. Both of these men become entranced with the past and how life was before aRead MoreThe Road By Cormac Mccarthy, Ray B radbury, And 19842199 Words   |  9 Pagescurrent state. The works that I used to investigate this genre were The Road by Cormac McCarthy, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, and 1984 by George Orwell. All of these books are categorized in the dystopian genre but have very different symbols, styles, and implications. Each of these novels have different styles because some include a society with overbearing rules, such as Fahrenheit 451 and 1984, whereas The Road has virtually no society. Despite their differences, the purpose of these novelsRead MoreRay Bradbury s Fahrenheit 4512323 Words   |  10 PagesPicture a world where one must meet the expectations of being normal, where diversity is not accepted, or even worse, a detached society where emotions no longer exist. By reading the first few pages of Fahrenheit 451, readers immediately get the feeling of a dystopian society. Firemen creating fires, instead of extinguishing them, and technology that has taken their society to a who le new level of entertainment. These are exaggerated ideas right off the bat, yet Ray Bradbury carries the readersRead MoreEssay The Myopia of Dystopia3805 Words   |  16 Pagesdeem the modern-day world as the good place(Hermon, Holman) but rather one of the indescribable atrocities of war, disease, hunger etc#8230; A utopian world is a difficult, if not impossible, one to forge. Novels such as Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and 1984 are dystopian novels, with often-satirical undertones within their pages. This works are allegories, sardonic depictions of our societies ills. Each work contain strong hard-hitting political messages with common themes such as the fine lineRead MoreFahrenheit 451: The Future is Now Essay2640 Words   |  11 PagesTruffaut’s treatment of the Nazi regime in comparison to the firemen in his film shows the type of government he desired to depict, one that â€Å"succinctly and successfully institutionalized mass schizophrenia,† a governme nt founded on the â€Å"murderous ideologies† of â€Å"Communism and Nazism† (Gonzalez 1), a totalitarian society mirroring the world in Bradbury’s novel among other dystopian novels of the time. His society fits the idea of totalitarianism in the fact that it is a â€Å"form of government that theoreticallyRead MoreAnalysis of The Bluest Eye and Other Works2035 Words   |  9 Pagesis not sure if her eyes are the bluest eyes. She also is going insane, talks to an imaginary friend, and thinks that her mother treats her coldly because she is jealous of her blue eyes. Claudia describes Pecolas as the giver of beauty since in comparison to her ugliness the rest of the community felt beautiful, and superior. Pecola was the scapegoat for the entire town, she is the place where they all dump the self-hatred they harbor in themselves for not fitting into Americas standard of beautyRead MoreMy Personal Narrative : My Literary Journey1641 Words   |  7 Pagesmiddle o f the school year. Moving schools is already a terrifying experience for a young boy, I had to leave my friends and make new ones and what if the kids at my new school didn’t like me? All of my early fears of moving schools were miniscule in comparison to what I actually discovered when I got to my class. At my previous school we had just mastered the alphabet and were beginning to learn how to read single words so you can imagine how aghast I was when I found out that every kid in my new classRead MoreAnalysis Of Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury And 1984 By George Orwell1784 Words   |  8 PagesMENTALITY OF CONFORMITY The societies in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and 1984 by George Orwell clearly show the serious effects of conformity. Despite the lack of freedom to think independently, both societies maintain their general happiness. Conformity is the most common and most persuasive form of social influence. The matching of attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors are signs of conformity. It has become an unconscious, natural part of everyday life; however, it has been occurring for centuriesRead MoreCritics of Novel 1984 by George Orwell14914 Words   |  60 Pages1984 In George Orwells 1984, Winston Smith wrestles with oppression in Oceania, a place where the Party scrutinizes human actions with ever-watchful Big Brother. Defying a ban on individuality, Winston dares to express his thoughts in a diary and pursues a relationship with Julia. These criminal deeds bring Winston into the eye of the opposition, who then must reform the nonconformist. George Orwells 1984 introduced the watchwords for life without freedom: BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU. WrittenRead MoreIntroduction : How ve He Do That?10829 Words   |  44 Pagesperfected with lots of practice and understanding memory, symbol, and pattern; this only enhances the reading and provokes the reader to analyze the text in a more productive way. Once you become a more avid reader you will be privileged to make comparisons, connections, and your own conclusion from the literary work you’re reading with certain aspects of many different literary works you’ve read along the way. Not only does this bring depth into the work for your better understanding of the â€Å"big idea†

Monday, December 9, 2019

Business Law Report

Question: Discuss the business structures and the equality act 2010. Answer: Introduction The present report is a very important piece of paper which covers two most important aspects that prevails in United Kingdom, that is, business structures in United Kingdom and the analysis of The Equality Act 2010. Part I of the report deals with an analysis of two kinds of business structures that are prevalent in United Kingdom, that is, Partnership and Limited Liability Company. Arguments are lay down which established that establishing a company is a better choice in comparison with a partnership. Various tax issues, control issues, etc are evaluated of both the business structures prior adhering with the notion, that a company is a better choice. Part II of the report analysis The Equality Act 2010 and what safeguard an employer must take in order to avoid any kind of unnecessary complaints. Both primary and secondary sources are used to justify the arguments made. Various provisions of the Ac are analysed which must be adhere by the employer so that protection and safeguard is provided to he employees. The reference List is added in the end. Business structures As per the given scenario, a business needs to be set up as a general partnership. However, there are arguments that are lay down which establishes that running a business in the form of a limited liability company will be a much better choice when compared with a general partnership. Thus, in order to justify the statement made above, it is important to evaluate the pros and cons of establishing a general partnership and a limited liability company and in what manner the establishment of a limited liability company is a better choice. In United Kingdom, a business can be establish in several manners, such as, as a sole proprietorship, as a partnership, as a limited liability partnership or as a limited liability company. All the forms are important depending upon the needs, desires, and resources of the person. Once a business structure is finalised by a person, then, such structure identifies his responsibilities, legal obligations, statutory issues, environmental issues, etc. (Spadaccini, 2009). But the two important business forms that are evaluated in the present report are a General Partnership and a Limited Liability Company. Both the structures are analysed individually and are then compared to justify the statement made above. A General Partnership Definition and elements A General Partnership (Partnership) is a business form wherein there must be at least two persons who intends to come together to formulate a business of incessant nature and with a motive to earn profits. This distinct structuring establishes very important elements in a partnership, such as: (McCahery Vermeulen, 2004) A partnership cannot be created by a single person and requires more than one person. The business must be of incessant nature and not a single activity. The motive of the partners is to earn profits. Advantages Once a partnership is formed then there are various advantages that can be associated with it. Such as, it is very simple, easy and economical to establish and create a partnership. This is because there is no formal procedure that is required for its information, such as, any kind of registration (as the same is required while forming a company). Rather, a simple partnership agreement defining the mutual rights and obligations of the Partners, the term of the partnership, profit sharing ratio, etc. Further, the partners carry out their tasks and are remunerated through drawings. This helps in securing tax advantage which is not present if the remuneration is made by giving salaries (as the same is done in a company). Also, there are no statutory obligations of filling any kind of return which is a very cumbersome, tedious and costly affair. (Fibbe, 2009) Thus, a Partnership is a business structure which is very popular and its advantages cannot be overlooked. But, in order to justify the statement made above, that is, running the business in the form of a limited liability company will be a much better choice when compared with a general partnership, it is important to analyse the structuring and advantages of a Limited Liability Company. A Limited Liability Company Definition and elements A Limited Liability Company (Company) is one of the business structures that can be established in United Kingdom. A company is a legal entity that has its separate existence in the eyes of law. In Salomon v Salomon (1897) the concept of Separate Legal Existence is explained and it was held by the House of Lords that a company is an artificial legal person and is separate from its members, employees and officers. This separate existence of a company has evolved various distinct features of a company, such as: (Puig, 2000) It has Limited Liability- The liability of the company is limited, that is, the shareholders of the company are liable only to the extent to their shareholdings and not beyond the same. Any liability that is beyond their shareholdings will not fall on their shoulders but must be equated by utilising the assets of the company (Lee v Lees Air Farming Ltd(1960). It has perpetual succession Perpetual succession implies that a company is an artificial legal person in law and is not associated with its officers and members. Thus, in Salomon case it was held that even if all the members of the company dies, the company still remain alive and active. It can sue in its own name and be sued by any other person. Now, on order to justify that a company is a better choice in comparison with a Partnership, it is important to analyse the advantages of a company. Advantages Once a company is formulated, there are numerous advantages that can associate with the same and which cannot be found in a partnership form of business. The same are: (Chris, 2016) A company is a separate legal entity in the eyes of law, that is, it is distinct and dissociated from its members and officers (Salomon v Salomon (1897)). Any acts that are carried out by a company are in its own name and not in the name of its members and officers. Thus, a company has power to enter into contracts, purchase property, sue in its own name, acquire funds, etc. (Academia, 2015) A company once formulated has limited liability, which implies that the liability of the shareholders is limited and cannot be imposed with financial burden beyond the extent of their shareholdings (Puig, 2000) The salaries and dividend of the directors are taxed separately, thus, by taking dividends they can minimise their NIC contribution. A company is ageless, that is, it has perpetual succession. A company never dies and thus even if all company members cease to exist, a company keeps on running. This is because a company is an artificial legal person and has distinct personality. (The Law Teacher, 2016) The Corporation Tax is 21% and which is very less. There is professionalism found in a company. The shares are easily transferrable. The company name is distinct and cannot be used or acquired by any other person or business form. Tax advantage can be acquired on employees executive pensions. Thus, these are the various advantages that are part of a company and which lacks in a partnership firm, thereby making a Limited Liability company a better choice to run a business. Further, there are few drawbacks in a partnership which also establishes that a company must be established in place of a partnership. Such as, a partnership has no separate legal personality, thus, the acts of the partnership will make the partners liable and vice versa. Further, there is no limited liability and thus the partners are liable to all the losses of the partnership. Also, there are chances of disputes as normally all partners are part of decision making process. The partnership cease to exist as soon as a partner dies or leaves the firm and a new partner is entered. Thus there is no perpetual succession. (Startupdonut, 2015) Thus, considering the advantages of a company and drawback of a firm, it is justified in submitting that establishing business in company form is a better choice. The Equality Act 2010 The client employs 100 people. In order to make sure that he comply with all laws and to avoid expensive claims from the employees (because of non-compliance of the laws), it is necessary to evaluate the steps that he must undertake. In order to do so the Equality Act 2010 is evaluated. The Equality Act 2010 has brought all the prior legislations under one head and has also strengthened some of the earlier provisions. It is now important to evaluate the provisions of the Equality Act 2010 so that unnecessary claims against the organisation by the employees can be avoided. One of the prominent features of the Equality Act 2010 is its Protected Characteristics. The same are established under section 4 of the Equality Act 2010. The various characteristics are: (ACAS, 2016) That every employee is protected and no regard must be made to his or her age while complying with the protection (section 5). The Equality Act 2010 permits the employee to remain absent from work if undergoing gender reassignment. Any discrimination made regarding the same is not permissible under section 7 of the Equality Act, 2010. The Act strictly made provisions regarding disability. As per section 6, schedule 1, if any unfair treatment is carried out towards any employees because of disability or like then such acts are not permissible, such as, any information which highlights the disability of the prospective employee is not allowed unless and until specific provision is made in such regard. Specifiable protections and safeguard are provided to pregnant women employees under section 9 of the Equality Act 2010. An employer has an obligation to treat all the employees alike and no gender preference is allowed. He must not make any discrimination on the basis of sex unless and until special provisions regarding the same is made. Any deviation is considered violation of section 11 of the Equality Act 2010. An employer must not discriminate its employees on the basis of Race and Religion and Belief as per section 10 of the Equality Act 2010. The concept of Sexual Orientation is safeguarded under section 12 of the Equality Act 2010. These are some of the protected characteristics that are obligatory on an employer to follow. The employer is also not permitted to make any kind of discrimination that is direct or indirect discrimination. A Direct Discrimination is lay down in section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 and which submits that when an employee is having protected characteristics and the employer acts in a manner wherein he gave favour to one employee over another then the employee is making direct discrimination. Whereas Indirect Discrimination is lay down in section 19 of the Equality Act 2010. It submits that the policies and rules framed which are advantageous to one employee but disadvantageous to another (mainly because of their protected characteristics) then it is a kind of indirect discrimination that is done by the employer and is not permissible under law. (Youngs, 2014) The employer must also make sure that: No discrimination by Perception is carried out, that is, when one person perceived that another person is having protected characteristics and then there is discrimination by an employer. No Victimization is undertaken by an employer as per section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. When an employee is part of the complaint that is filed against the organisation and if an employer treats such employee who has supported he complaint in awful manner then such acts of the employer is called victimization of employee and is not permissible. An employer is not permitted to harass any employee and is laid down in section 26 of the Equality Act 2010. Also, an employer can protect himself and the organisation from employee claims provided an employer apart from complying with protected characteristics and avoiding any kind of discrimination, victimization, harassment etc, must: An employer is not permitted to advertise for a job which establishes gender discrimination or age discrimination unless and until the discrimination is the main essential for the performance of the job. Comply with the provisions of section 77 of the Equality Act 2010. Section 77 emphasis the concept of Equal Pay without any gender discrimination. It submits that if equal work is undertaken by both men and women then they both are eligible for equal pay without any gender discrimination. It is necessary that whenever an employer is undertaking the activity of recruitment then the same must be clear and unambiguous. If the process is found to be discriminatory then it is nothing but violation of Equality Act 2010. For instance, if the recruitment process discriminates on the basis of age, gender, etc then the same is not permissible. As per the Equality Act 2010, an employer is permissible to seek information related to health of the employee provided the same is the basic requirement of the job offered, but, beyond that the employer is not permissible to seek any health information related to the employee. An employer prior fixing the pay and benefits of the employee must consider some of the factors, such as, employees skills, rate which is applicable in the same sector, employees performance, etc. an employer must make sure that no discrimination must be made while allotting any kind of benefits and pays to the employees. Any discrimination must be based on proper reasoning provided by the employer. An employer must make sure that while fixing the working hours of the employees no discrimination must be made. In order to enhance the performance of an employee it is important that an employer must timely promote and transfer an employee. While doing so it is necessary that no discrimination must be made. If the same is done the it is contrary to the provisions of the Equality Act 2010. It is necessary that an employer must make sure that he implements such policies, rules and procedures that educate and train the employees so that better results can be achieved. Also, the employer must make sure that proper policies and rules must be framed so that an employee can seek the benefits of promotions and transfers. This will help in the enhancements of the loyalty and moral of the employees. Training must also be provided so that an employee must adhere himself with the latest technologies and skills so that he can produce much better results. An employer must make sure that the training, education, etc must be provided by an employer to the employee without any discrimination. It is important that any disciplinary procedure undertaken by an employer upon the employee must not be fair and reasonable and must adhere to changes as an hen the need arises. Hence, these are the provisions of the Equality Act 2001 and various procedures that must be comply by an employer in order to avoid any kind of undue hardship from the employees. But, if suppose the employer is not able to comply with the adequate procedure and does not follow the provisions of the Equality Act 2010, then, in such scenario section 124 of the Equality Act 2010 is applicable. As per the section the Employment Tribunal is authorised to lay down the procedure that must be followed by the employer and the organisation in order o avoid any kind of discrimination and hardship upon the employee. The procedure laid down by the tribunal is not binding but can be used as a support to lay evidence. Thus, all the above provisions and regulations must be followed in order to avoid any kind of expensive claims from the employees. Bibliography Books/Articles/Journals Chris D, Separate personality and limited liability are cornerstones of UK Company law. Discuss with reference to advantages and disadvantages of separate personality (2016). Fibbe G, EC Law Aspects of Hybrid Entities (2009) Puig G A, A Two-Edged Sword: Salomon and the Separate Legal Entity Doctrine (2000). Youngs R, English, French German Comparative Law (2014) Routledge McCahery Vermeulen, The Governance of Close Corporations and Partnerships:US and European Perspectives (2004) Oxford University press. Case Law Lee v Lees Air Farming Ltd(1960). Salomon v Salomon (1897). Online Material ACAS, The Equality Act Whats new for employers? (2016) https://www.acas.org.uk/media/pdf/n/8/Equality_Act_2010_guide_for_employers-accessible-version-Nov-2011.pdf. Academia, Separate Legal personality and Limited Liability are cornerstones of UK Company Law. Discuss with reference to advantages and disadvantages of separate legal personality (2015) https://www.academia.edu/9819084/_Separate_personality_and_limited_liability_are_cornerstones_of_UK_Company_law._Discuss_with_reference_to_advantages_and_disadvantages_of_separate_personality. Spadaccini M, Entrepreneur, (2009) https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/200516. Startupdonut, Should You trade as a partnership or a limited company (2015) https://www.startupdonut.co.uk/blog/2014/03/should-you-trade-partnership-or-limited-company The Law Teacher, A company is an artificial person created by law (2016) https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/business-law/a-company-law-essays.php.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Reform Judaism In The 19th Century Essays - Reform Judaism

Reform Judaism in the 19th Century The most extreme precursor to the Reform movement was a man by the name of Samuel Holdheim. He was born in 1806 in Kempo in the province of Posen. At a young age he studied at a yeshiva and received a Talmudic education. He began to study German and secular subjects after his marriage to a woman with a modern education. After their divorce several years later, he began studying at the University of Prague and Berlin and received a doctorate from the University of Leipzig. Following service in Frankfurt -Am-Oder he became a Landesrabbiner or chief Rabbi of Mecklenberg-Schewerin. In the year 1847 he became the rabbinate of a reform congregation in Berlin . At this point he already disapproved of most liberal Rabbis and came to be known as the most exemplar of reform Rabbis in all of Europe ( 241) The question comes to mind as to what exactly triggered this different belief in Judaism which differed significantly from previous tenents. It started during the time of the French revolution, a time when European Jews were (for the first time) recognized as citizens of the countries in which they lived in. Ghettos were being abolished, special badges were no longer required and Jews could dress the way they wanted, settle were they pleased and work the occupations they desired. Many Jews settled outside of Jewish districts, and began to live like their neighbors and speak the language of the land. They went to public schools and began to neglect Jewish Studies and forget about he Shulchan Aruch. In 1815, after Napoleon's defeat, Jews lost the rights of citizenship in many countries. Many Jews converted to Christianity in order to retain those rights. Many thoughtful Jews were concerned about this. They realized that many of these changes took place not because of a dislike for Judaism, but in order to obtain better treatment. Many rabbis believed that the way to address this was to force Jews to give up public schools and universities. This didn't work. Rabbis suggested that observance might have to be changed in order to appeal to the Jew living the modern world. They realized that every now and then old practices and new ones were introduced, resulting in a different lifestyle then 4000 or even 2000 years previously. They fathomed that these changes often made life easier for the Jew. They concluded that in order to make Judaism attractive to all Jews this change had to continue. A group of Rabbis assembled in Germany, and changes began, thus developed the start of Reform Judaism. Holdheim a reform Rabbi himself felt that the Jews living during his time period should change the laws given to them at Mt. Sinai and the halacha that the Talmud and Mishna state. Holdheim believed that the laws of the Torah and the Talmud that were in effect when the Jews had their own country and government have lost their legitimacy. Judaism now had to be in accord with both the letter and the spirit of laws of the nations they were living among. Even the laws of the Torah whose source was God had to be regarded as valid for certain times and places as he said " with the change of the circumezces and conditions of life for which God once gave those laws , the laws themselves cease to be operative, that they shall be observed no longer because they no longer can be observed". Thus , Holdheim said that the biblical and Talmudic laws concerning marriage, divorce and personal status are no longer relevant and the Jews in these cases should be ruled by the state government (Sasson 835). He concluded that laws between man and man should be left to the rule of the state they lived in but questions of prayer and religious institutions should be left to the Rabbis because prayer was the most important part of religious life. Holdheim denied the authority of the Talmudic dicta, the oral law. He says that it was written by the hand of man but was divinely inspired. His conclusion was that Jewish life should be based on spiritual and ethical guidance of the Torah. Even though